And really, what is (besides a 4.5% 30-year fixed)? It's cool; it came to SF burdened with great expectations, and it was never able to live up to that original listing price. Still, if green doesn't carry a PRICE premium in a down market, could it carry at least a foot traffic premium? We'd like to (and truthfully, we do) think so.
First, the bad news: SF's first green home hit the resale market this month, with some unfortunate news.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Green Not a Panacea in a Down Market
Posted by Avenue Associates: at 4:03 PM
Labels: green building premiums, SF